Abstract. For transport unmanned aerial vehicles, selecting propulsion characteristics is a key consideration. A distinction must be made between lift propulsors, which must provide sufficient thrust within limited dimensions, and cruise propulsors, which primarily require high efficiency in both hover and forward flight. The results of developing a numerical simulation methodology for isolated propellers and ducted fans are presented, including the selection of turbulence models under conditions of a potential laminar-turbulent transition. The studied objects include K184V propellers and VK1 ducted fans, developed at the Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute (TsAGI) for hovercraft propulsion systems. The one-equation Spalart-Allmaras model and two-equation models based on k-ε and k-ω variables are investigated. The turbulence models are verified against benchmark data to account for the laminar-turbulent transition and the presence of separation bubbles on the blade and duct surfaces. One method for dividing the flow region into laminar, turbulent, and transitional zones is introducing the intermittency parameter γ into the turbulence model equations, where γ is equal to unity in fully developed turbulent flow and zero in laminar flow. The Langtry-Menter k-ω SST Re_θ-γ transition model is one such turbulence model that uses the intermittency parameter and accounts for the laminar flow region effect. A geometric multigrid method is used to solve the difference equations. The numerical simulation yields pressure and velocity fields both in the computational domain and directly on the blade and duct surfaces, allowing the determination of aerodynamic characteristics of the ducted fan under various operating conditions. For hover and forward-flight conditions, the calculated dependencies of thrust and power coefficients, as well as propulsive efficiency, are obtained for a wide range of rotational speeds and engine power inputs. The results are compared with benchmark experimental data from TsAGI. Accounting for the laminar-turbulent transition and the associated formation of thin laminar separation bubbles significantly improves the agreement between the computational results and experimental data.

Keywords: unmanned aerial vehicle, propeller, ducted fan, numerical simulation, laminar-turbulent transition, turbulence model, propulsive efficiency 

For citation: Arkhipov P. A., Bulat P. V., Dudnikov S. Yu., Kuznetsov P. N. Development of a numerical simulation methodology for propellers and ducted fans of transport unmanned aerial vehicles with a takeoff weight of 80 to 350 kg. Aerospace Engineering and Technology. 2026. Vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 237–249. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.52467/2949-401X-2026-4-2-237-249; https://elibrary.ru/pothgc 

References

1. Chen J., Li L., Huang G., Xiang X. Numerical investigations of ducted fan aerodynamic performance with tip-jet. Aerospace Science and Technology. 2018. Vol. 78. Pp. 510–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.05.016
2. Abalakin I. V., Bakhvalov P. A., Bobkov V. G., Kozubskaya T. K., Anikin V. A. Numerical investigation of the aerodynamic and acoustical properties of a shrouded rotor. Fluid Dynamics. 2016. Vol. 51, no 3, pp. 419–433. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0015462816030145
3. Nazarov D. V., Kondryakova A. V. Analisys of the flow past the screw with the use of numericaland experimental simulation. Izvestia of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2018. Vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 70–75. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/XYKVHN
4. Lind R., Nathman J. K., Gilchrist I. Ducted rotor performance calculations and comparisons with experimental data. 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. AIAA 2006-1069. Reno, NV, January 9–12, 2006. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-1069
5. Bulat P. V., Prodan N. V., Vokin L. O. Comparison of turbulence models in the numerical simulation of the model ducted propeller. Russian Aeronautics. 2022. Vol.65, no. 4, pp. 713– https://doi.org/10.3103/s1068799822040110
6. Spalart P. R., Allmaras S. R. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, January 6–9, 1992, Reno, NV. AIAA Paper AIAA-1992-0439. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1992-439
7. Menter F. R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal. 1994. Vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1598–1605. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149
8. Rybakov D.V., Dudnikov S.Y., Bulat P.V., Chernyshov P.S., Vokin L.O. Investigation of numerical approaches to modeling large-scale turbulent vortex flows in the mode of vertical take-off and landing of an aircraft. Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics. 2021. Vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 410–417 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17586/2226-1494-2021-21-3-410-417
9. Dehaeze F., Barakos G. N., Kusyumov A. N., Kusyumov S. A., Mikhailov S. A. Exploring the detached-eddy simulation for main rotor flow. Russian Aeronautics. 2018. Vol. 61. No. 1. Pp. 40–47. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068799818010063
10. Bulat M. P., Vokin L. O., Volobuev I. A. Research of ducted propellers. comparison of ducted propellers with conventional single-row and x-shaped double-row propellers. Russian Aeronautics. 2023. Vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 242–246. https://doi.org/10.3103/s106879982302006x
11. Kim H. W., Brown R. E. A comparison of coaxial and conventional rotor performance. Journal of the American Helicopter Society. 2009. Vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 012004-1. https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.55.012004
12. Lakshminarayan V., Baeder J. Computational investigation of small scale coaxial rotor aerodynamics in hover. 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 2009, Orlando, Florida, 5–8 January 2009. Vol. 19, 12522 https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-1069
13. Shyy W., Lian Y., Tang J., Viieru D., Liu H. Aerodynamics of Low Reynolds Number Flyers. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008. 196 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551154
14. Rajmohan N., Zhao J., He C. A coupled vortex particle/CFD methodology for studying coaxial rotor configurations 5th Decennial AHS Aeromechanics Specialists’ Conference 2014, Current Challenges and Future Directions in Rotorcraft Aeromechanics, 22–24 January 2014, San Francisco, California, USA. Vol. 1, pp. 576–587.
15. Dudnikov S. Yu., Kuznetsov P. N., Mel’nikova A. I. Research of ducted propellers. comparison of coaxial, four bladed, and eight-bladed counter-rotating propeller. Russian Aeronautics. 2023. Vol. 66, no. 2. pp. 259–266. https://doi.org/10.3103/s1068799823020095
16. Menter F. R., Langtry R., Volker S. Transition modelling for general purpose CFD codes. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion. 2006. Vol. 77. Pp. 277–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-006-9047-1

Ostroukhov S. P. Aerodinamika vozdushnykh vintov i vintokol’tsevykh dvizhitelei [Aerodynamics of propellers and ducted propellers]. Moscow: FIZMATLIT, 2014. 328 p. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/UGLGGP